Archive for the ‘Web 2.0’ Category

If I Could Be a Government Web Site Manager

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

By Denise Eisner

I work alongside some very dedicated, passionate web people in government. They want to have web sites that are usable, readable and of value to the audiences they’re intended to reach. For reasons both obvious to those in government and to anyone else who has tried to push new ideas in large organizations, there’s a set of what we euphemistically term “challenges” to achieving these goals.

But let’s say for a moment that said challenges were surmountable and the HIPPO (Highest Paid Person in the Office) was giving me carte blanche to run the web site per accepted best practices and the latest in research-driven design principles. Wow! Colour me happy!

Quick, before the HIPPO changes his/her mind, here’s my wish list:

  • Double the size of the web team – No site that is designed to reach audience segments as vast and varied as those served by government sites can be run with two people, neither of which have time to strategize, plan, write, edit, apply metatags, code, test, and perform quality control, all while responding to the latest request to convert a 200-page report to HTML. Scale the team to the size of the site really needed by users.
  • Let my team control the site design – Everyone has opinions but design by opinion war only leads to chaos and bad feeling. I’ll consult with stakeholders, sure. I’ll amass quality research to back up my ideas and proposals (web metrics, surveys, usability tests, etc.). But I’ll make all high-level design decisions regarding navigation, breadcrumbs and landing pages. And I’ll be able to defend those decisions with data.
  • Have dedicated IT resource(s) on the Web team – Rather than have the disconnect that can exist between varying business units, combine the various skill sets needed to have a strong web group capable of supporting high-quality content and web infrastructure.
  • Publish good content, not FAQs – I was recently inspired by R. Stephen Gracey’s post on how FAQS “seem to constitute a basic instruction manual or else call attention to selling features, making them only marginally useful to users with real questions.” I want good writers to develop quality, searchable content and an editor to oversee publishing standards.
  • Help me get the web strategy approved – I need senior support for defining why we need a web site and who we really serve (beyond the catch-all “all Canadians”). This will help me maintain a focused web operation that strategic, not reactionary, and supports our business priorities.
  • Approve a governance model for the web – In order to make informed, strategic decisions around the web, particularly for the aforementioned strategy, let’s implement the roles we defined for a web champion, working group, ad hoc teams and steering committee.
  • I’ll just do Web 2.0, now – Hey, I’ll start a blog! I found a SME who’s willing to share his/her expertise with a specific audience (teachers, businesspeople, scientists), so I added the blog to the site, moderated it myself, and can report the site activity to management. It involves extra work but as EPA web 2.0 guru Jeffrey Levy told me last year, you learn by doing. We’ll keep an eye on performance and keep tweaking it as needed.
  • Good measurement tools – You only can manage what you can measure. Let’s get the right tool and get a professional to configure it according to our performance indicators. I can help find efficiencies if I have good data to present to senior management.

Quite a wish list, but these approaches all point to effective site management.

Google – Better on the Outside than on the Inside?

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

By Lindsay Fraser

My all time favourite Far Side cartoon features two polar bears looming over an igloo.  One says to the other: “I just love these things – cool and crunchy on the outside, warm and chewy on the inside”.

This cartoon comes to mind whenever I am talking to colleagues about the use of Google on Canadian government intranets. I can’t help but think that Google is better on the “outside” than it is on the “inside”.  Now, don’t get me wrong, I am not a Google-basher. I love Google. I love Google today the way that I loved and adored Yahoo back in 1994, when I couldn’t imagine anything better.

Google is a tremendous resource, second only to GEDS in my personal favourites list. It is such a marvelous Internet search engine that it leads decision makers to think “anything that good must be a great solution for our intranet too – right?”

NO, No, an emphatic no.  And I hate to say it – I really do.

I am the first to agree that any search is better than no search – absolutely.

But the black-box that is Google does not typically help workers inside the organization find the materials on the intranet that are best suited to their working requirements.

Granted, we don’t understand all that well how the Google algorithms work (a closely guarded secret as you might well appreciate); but we do understand that Google focuses on concepts such as word counts, proximity of words to other words, location of words in web pages (titles, top of page) etc. This focus allows Google to do a great job of bringing to its users potentially relevant returns from a massive and totally random world wide web.

But on the inside, where the information collection is much smaller, far less random and actually has some structure and logic to it, Google’s effectiveness is greatly reduced. Employees want access to particular types of information (leave forms, for example), and don’t want a results set that contains every instance of the word “leave”.

Employees also want easy access into the top level of various information resources (the key entry and summary documents) so they can understand the context of the information returned to them and then choose the depth to which they will perform their reading and analysis.

Owing to significant challenges at the time, Google designed its algorithms to foil search engine spammers and other unreliable publishers who were misrepresenting the nature of their information content in order to have it come up in as many relevant results lists as possible. Google couldn’t trust that the information that publishers provided in association with their Web resources (metadata) was truly reliable and therefore built algorithms that placed little credence in such data.

Internally though, organizations understand their information holdings and understand who the users of said holdings are. Organizations also have information architects, publishers and editors, who can assign reliable metadata such as objective indications of page importance, page “type” in a hierarchy and resource type (e.g. form, policy etc.). It is this trusted metadata that allows search engines to return truly relevant search results to organizational users – and sadly, metadata is not something that Google has been developed to exploit.

For internal intranet search purposes, organizations should look to search tools and appliances that will also allow for the rich exploitation of trusted publisher input. If Google is the only option, then organizations should look to acquire the most flexible of the Google offerings and to take full advantage of the “weighting” options that are available. Google is undeniably great – but perhaps better on the outside than on the inside.

Lindsay Fraser is the Principal and Practice Lead for Systemscope’s Information Management practice.She can be reached at fraser@systemscope.com.

When Social Media in Government Works…Or Not So Much

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is one of the U.S. government leaders in the creative use of social media tools to support its mission. Jeffrey Levy, EPA’s Director of Web Communications, has made it his mission to share his experiences, including successes, lessons learned, and barriers – both perceived and real. He did so again with more than 60 Canadian public service managers at the Systemscope Executive Breakfast at GTEC in October, 2009.

Denise Eisner of Systemscope’s Government Service Excellence practice sat down with Jeffrey after GTEC to discuss his experiences and impressions.


You met with several federal Canadian department representatives during your brief stay in Canada. What stood out for you in terms of the challenges faced by departments who are planning for or engaging in social media to reach their audiences?

The fact that we all face the same issues: serving our missions, being creative, yet exploring new tools while meeting good governance requirements like records management and accessibility.


Any surprises during those conversations?

I didn’t realize that everything the Canadian government does has to be done in both French and English.  I’m guessing that doesn’t merely double the difficulty, but more like squares it.


In your experience at the EPA, how has social media moved the agency’s agenda forward? How were these activities connected to your overall communications strategy?

So far, social media at EPA is mostly about communications and education.  As we consider our needs, we ask what social media tools would help and choose the ones that will help most and fit within our resources.  For example, last Earth Day, we wanted to deliver daily tips to people, so we used a mix of “traditional” tools like email distribution, social media like creating a podcast series that we put into iTunes and also put the tips into a widget people can put on their own site.

We’re also slowly starting to explore using social media for policy development.  For example, our enforcement office currently has a discussion forum running to hear people’s thoughts about setting enforcement priorities:.

And we have two efforts to build communities around managing watersheds and providing training about green jobs.  The idea is that by helping people do their environmental jobs better, we “produce” environmental protection, even when it’s not EPA staff doing the work.


Canadian departments and agencies have a number of requirements when communicating with the public, particularly in terms of our bilingual policies. Any thoughts on how to best meet these challenges when engaging in social media?

Start small.  That’s really the same advice I give everyone.  It’s very easy to jump into multiple projects and then discover it’s not quite as simple or quick as you thought.  So especially with the dual-language requirement, try things that lend themselves to being done simply.  For example, we put all of our news releases out via RSS on Twitter.  Since Canadian agencies are already publishing news releases in both languages, set up two Twitter accounts to promote them.

The same thing might go for a podcast series, where you record each one twice, but then there’s no ongoing resource use.

In contrast, running two Facebook fan pages really does at least double the complexity, because you have all the issues of encouraging engagement and then reacting, but now in two languages.


At the Systemscope executive breakfast at GTEC in October, you mentioned social media projects that didn’t always go as expected. Can you elaborate on one project and the lessons learned from that experience?

Pick 5 for the Environment is a project where we challenge people to commit to at least 5 of 10 environmental actions.  We went from concept to launch in 19 days.  It included a Facebook fan page and groups on both Flickr and YouTube.  Our hope was that it would take off in all three social media communities, without much input from us. We were wrong.  The fan page has actually gotten some attention, and we have nearly 1300 fans.  But the accompanying Facebook app hasn’t really taken off.  And the Flickr and YouTube groups haven’t generated much interest. So now we’re reassessing, thinking creatively about whether and how to use those outlets.  Most of our energy is going into thinking about how the people who signed up can generate excitement, share their stories, etc.


As part of our web maturity model, Systemscope focuses on helping clients examine roles and competencies that will support their web strategies. What is the skill set that government organizations need to acquire or build to be truly proficient at social media?

Great question.  Can you let me know the answer? :)   There really isn’t a single answer, but here are some of the skills I’m trying to build and encourage within my team: creativity, time management, writing, project management, analysis, and actually using social media tools.  That is, I believe that to use something like Facebook well, you need to use it yourself; reading about features and diving in yourself are two entirely different experiences.  I play Facebook games partly because they’re fun and partly to see what kinds of experiences they create, in hopes we can mimic that in what we offer.  The same thing goes with Twitter, Flickr, and any other site.


What do you like about Canada?

Natural beauty and friendly people.  I’ve had the great fortune of visiting Banff, Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal, and now I’ve had the pleasure of exploring at least a little bit of Ottawa.

MANAGING INFORMATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR
April 26-27, 2010
- Architecting for the E-Record, presented by Linda Daniels-Lewis. Read More

Procurement - Talk to us about
TBIPS and SBIPS! Read More